<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.consultantcommons.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Evaluation</title>
 <link>http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/taxonomy/term/79/feed</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>eng</language>
<item>
 <title>NTRS 1: Optimizing the Nonprofit-Consultant Relationship - Resources</title>
 <link>http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/ntrs_1_optimizing_the_nonprofit_consultant_relationship_resources</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Selecting a Consultant or Vendor&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Choosing the Right Consultant&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techsoup.org/howto/articles/consultants/page1412.cfm?cg=searchterms&amp;amp;sg=consultant&quot;&gt;http://www.techsoup.org/howto/articles/consultants/page1412.cfm?cg=searchterms&amp;amp;sg=consultant&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Focuses on what to ask in the interview process&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;Do You Really Need A Consultant?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techsoup.org/howto/articles/consultants/page1418.cfm?cg=searchterms&amp;amp;sg=consultant&quot;&gt;http://www.techsoup.org/howto/articles/consultants/page1418.cfm?cg=searchterms&amp;amp;sg=consultant&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Questions to explore when deciding among consultants, in-house staff or volunteers&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;og_rss_groups&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/group/managing_your_consultancy&quot;&gt;Managing your Consultancy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/ntrs_1_optimizing_the_nonprofit_consultant_relationship_resources&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/ntrs_1_optimizing_the_nonprofit_consultant_relationship_resources#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/managing_your_consultancy_tags/bids_scopes_contracts">Bids, scopes, contracts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/managing_your_consultancy_tags/client_intake">Client Intake</category>
 <category domain="http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/managing_your_consultancy_tags/cost_budgeting">Cost/Budgeting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/managing_your_consultancy_tags/evaluation">Evaluation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/managing_your_consultancy_tags/managing_scope">Managing Scope</category>
 <category domain="http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/managing_your_consultancy_tags/nonprofit_technology_roundtable_series">Nonprofit Technology Roundtable Series</category>
 <category domain="http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/toolbox_tags/staffing">Staffing</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.consultantcommons.org/files/NTRS Resources Handout.doc" length="39424" type="application/octet-stream" />
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:50:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>elio</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">410 at http://www.consultantcommons.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Implementation Lifecycle</title>
 <link>http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/implementation_lifecycle</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Implementation Lifecycle
&lt;p&gt;This document is a brief outline of the lifecycle of a typical technology implementation project. It is organized in phases, which should be pretty self-explanatory. Within each phase are different activities, deliverables, and tools. Deliverables are &lt;strong&gt;bolded&lt;/strong&gt;. &lt;em&gt;Tools&lt;/em&gt; are italicized.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1)Outreach&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;og_rss_groups&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/group/managing_your_consultancy&quot;&gt;Managing your Consultancy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/implementation_lifecycle&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/implementation_lifecycle#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/managing_your_consultancy_tags/communications">Communications</category>
 <category domain="http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/managing_your_consultancy_tags/designing_an_engagement">Designing an Engagement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/managing_your_consultancy_tags/evaluation">Evaluation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/managing_your_consultancy_tags/managing_scope">Managing Scope</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.consultantcommons.org/files/Implementation Lifecycle.doc" length="31232" type="application/octet-stream" />
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 14:18:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>elio</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">219 at http://www.consultantcommons.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Database Planning Process Evaluation</title>
 <link>http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/database_planning_process_evaluation</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Database Planning Process Evaluation
&lt;p&gt;Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an effort to improve our recommended database planning process we need your input. Your comments are extremely valuable, as is your experience using the materials and working with us. We will use your input to continue to develop a useful database planning process and workbook for nonprofit organizations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;og_rss_groups&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/group/managing_your_consultancy&quot;&gt;Managing your Consultancy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/database_planning_process_evaluation&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/database_planning_process_evaluation#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/managing_your_consultancy_tags/client_satisfaction">Client Satisfaction</category>
 <category domain="http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/managing_your_consultancy_tags/evaluation">Evaluation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/toolbox_tags/planning">Planning</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:18:37 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>elio</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">139 at http://www.consultantcommons.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Post Project Review Overview</title>
 <link>http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/post_project_review_overview</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Policy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Post project reviews should be held on all Technology Planning Team projects.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Projects that have previously included peer review of deliverables should skip that step in the post project review.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently, time that is used for post project review should be accounted for under the project code, but as unbillable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;og_rss_groups&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/group/managing_your_consultancy&quot;&gt;Managing your Consultancy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/post_project_review_overview&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/post_project_review_overview#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/managing_your_consultancy_tags/evaluation">Evaluation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/managing_your_consultancy_tags/quality_assurance">Quality Assurance</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:08:31 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>elio</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">120 at http://www.consultantcommons.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Peer Review Process</title>
 <link>http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/peer_review_process</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Policy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For major deliverables, technology plans, RFPs, procedure documents we will under go a full review.Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â  For other documents, the author must ensure they are proof-read by another staff member before delivery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Time for proof reading should be taken into account when writing a document.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Review time will be included in new scopes of work - 4 hrs/major deliverable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;og_rss_groups&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/group/managing_your_consultancy&quot;&gt;Managing your Consultancy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/peer_review_process&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/peer_review_process#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/managing_your_consultancy_tags/evaluation">Evaluation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.consultantcommons.org/eng/managing_your_consultancy_tags/quality_assurance">Quality Assurance</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:24:15 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>elio</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">109 at http://www.consultantcommons.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
